Research agents keep a registry of current and announced facilities from public sources. An estimation engine turns each one into economics, environmental footprint and community impact. An advisor searches energy mixes, issues a go, conditional or no-go verdict, and writes a build plan you can play through in the simulation.
Where to build next, what it costs, how long until first revenue, and which sites the advisor would not sign off on.
What each facility does to the grid, the water table, the air, and the local economy, and whether the operator has a viable path.
Risk-adjusted ranking of the pipeline with live sensitivity to power prices and utilization, and the verdict behind each number.
| Site | Status | MW | Capex | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Sydney campus Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | Under construction | 400 | $13.8B | Conditional |
| Narvik AI campus Narvik, Nordland, Norway | Planned | 300 | $9.8B | Go |
| Sines campus Sines, Alentejo, Portugal | Under construction | 1,200 | $41.4B | Conditional |
| Hyderabad AI campus Hyderabad, Telangana, India | Planned | 500 | $17.9B | Conditional |
| Johor Bahru cluster Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia | Under construction | 1,500 | $53.0B | No go |
| Humain hyperscale Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | Planned | 1,500 | $53.2B |
Policy outcomes so far: 2 auto-approved · 2 sent to a human · 0 denied. A no-go verdict never spends, refunds are never gated, and every decision is written onto its payment in the ledger.
| Stargate UAE Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates | Under construction | 1,000 | $37.7B | Go |
| Hyperscale campus Hesse Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany | Operational | 1,200 | $40.6B | No go |